DLF's Dynasty Fantasy Football Sleeper Rankings

Posted on August 2, 2022

Shane Manila picks out a 'sleeper' he is avoiding and two he is targeting at their current price.

Gain Instant Access to this content and so much more.

A full year of DLF Premium access is only $49.99.

Try DLF Premium for only $9.99 with a Monthly Subscription.

Or better yet, get a DLF Annual Membership for FREE! Find out how

Premium membership provides access to all of our awesome dynasty content. No confusing plans, no shell games, just everything you need with one simple subscription.

The best dynasty rankings in the industry
Dynasty, Rookie & Superflex ADP
Dynasty Trade Analyzer and other awesome tools
Our annual Dynasty & Rookie Draft Guides
365 days of content, tools, advice and support
And so much more!

Want more information about DLF Premium? Find out more

Have questions or need some help? Contact Us

Already a DLF Premium Member? Log in now

Join DLF Today!

DLF’s Dynasty Fantasy Football Sleeper Rankings

Related Items:featured, premium

3 Comments

5 4 votes

Article Rating

3 Comments

Oldest

Newest Most Voted

Inline Feedbacks

View all comments

Littlewing745

10 months ago

I love this site, love the analysis, but I do have to point out this time that Jimmy G has been a true starting QB for three seasons – and a winner (by and large) to your point – but his team also drafted a guy to take over for him. I mean…I am not sure that actually IS much better that Trubisky or Daniel Jones, is it? Trubisky lost a starting gig and has gotten a new one. Daniel Jones may (or may not) do the same. Jimmy G’s only legitimate suitor is a team waiting for him to be cut. Again: are we THAT sure he’s such a better bet? I feel like some important details were left out haha

Shane Manila

Author

Reply to Littlewing745

10 months ago

They most assuredly did draft his replacement, but even knowing that I have a hard time seeing Daniel Jones or Trubisky as better QB/fantasy players. I guess I am presuming that Jones is going to fail again in 2022, which is an assumption certainly not a given.